R&D innovation path
Where a firm is undertaking genuine experimental AI development, BobStack may help structure the technical work as an R&D program. Any R&DTI eligibility or claim is assessed separately and depends on the firm's activities, evidence, expenditure and professional advice.
Discuss the technical problemWho this path may suit
Firms tackling a problem with genuine technical uncertainty, where the outcome can't be known in advance.
Leadership willing to drive the development and participate in systematic experimentation.
Teams prepared to keep evidence of hypotheses, experiments, observations and conclusions.
What this path is not
Not a guaranteed eligibility, registration, tax benefit or refund.
Not a way to make every AI project "R&D". Routine implementation doesn't qualify.
Not tax or legal advice. Eligibility is assessed independently by the firm's advisers.
The experimental loop
The point is not to make the project sound innovative. It is to reduce uncertainty through a disciplined series of tests and keep a defensible record of what was learned.
Hypothesis
Experiment
Observation
Conclusion
BobStack
Technical problem, build and evidence
Your firm
Domain context, participation and decisions
Independent adviser
Eligibility and claim guidance
How the roles work
Owns the problem, the experiments and the evidence. The innovation is entirely client-specific.
Provides architectural guidance and helps structure the technical activity as a coherent R&D program.
R&DTI eligibility, registration and claims are handled by an independent advisory partner, not by BobStack.
R&DTI eligibility depends on each firm's activities, evidence and expenditure, and is assessed with independent professional advice. BobStack does not provide tax or legal advice, and nothing on this page guarantees any incentive outcome.
Evidence by design
A credible technical program makes evidence a working habit: what was believed, what changed, what was observed and why the next step was chosen.
Standard implementation
Best when the desired result and technical path can be mapped with reasonable confidence.
See implementationExperimental development
Best when systematic tests are needed before the team can know whether or how the capability can work.
Bring the problem you can't solve with known methods. We'll map the technical work and connect you with independent advice on whether the R&D path fits.
Get startedA short, practical conversation. No obligation.